![]() ![]() Which one has more risk? It would take lots of lawyers to sort through this and no one pays for lawyers to go to standards meetings. There are certainly inherent issues with H.264. The H.264 camp speculated that there could be legal issues with VP8 despite Google’s claims otherwise. VP8 yielded no overwhelming winner (they are both great codecs), the debate has more recently revealed it’s true form as a mostly IPR related issue. ![]() ![]() While debate over the technical merits of H.264 vs. Quick debate recapĮngineers don’t like lawyers, and as Victor mentioned in his post earlier this week, much of the debate over assigning a mandatory video codec for WebRTC has been about avoiding the lawyers. Given the news from Cisco yesterday we figured this warranted a quick follow-up post beyond what we could add to the comments area. We had a lot of traffic to Victor’s post on the WebRTC mandatory video codec earlier this week.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |